Ween the reference and test groups. Qualities Sex, n ( ) Male Female
Ween the reference and test groups. Qualities Sex, n ( ) Male Female Age (years), mean SD Age category, n ( ) 184 years 254 years 454 years 65 years BMI (kg/m2 ), imply SD BMI category, n ( ) Underweight, 18.four Regular weight, 18.54.9 Overweight, 259.9 Obese, 30 Added sugars intake (g), imply SD 13 C (), mean SD Reference Group (n = 256) n ( ) Unless Otherwise Noted 60 (23) 197 (77) 42.four 14.7 Test Group (n = 56) n ( ) Unless Otherwise Noted 34 (61) 22 (39) 53.1 16.0 Test Statistic and p-Value 2 = 30.6 p 0.001 F = 23.7 p 0.001 2 = 28.5 p 0.33 (13) 117 (46) 91 (35) 16 (six) 31.8 9.7 (12.5) 7 (12.five) 30 (53.5) 12 (21.five) 29.five four.F = three.4 p = 0.07 2 = ten.0 p = 0.three (1) 65 (25.five) 65 (25.5) 124 (48) 88.eight 58.0 (0) 6 (11) 24 (43) 26 (46) 68.eight 43.F = 5.8 p = 0.02 F = ten.3 p = 0.001 F = 526.9 p 0.-19.1 0.7.four 0.a-19.5 0.9.1 0.Nutrients 2021, 13, x meanPEER Evaluation 15 N (), FOR SD aSample size for 15 N for reference group = 115.Figure 1. Reported added sugars intake in comparison to predicted added sugarssugarsfor the 13 C single-carbon and 13 C and 13C Figure 1. Reported added sugars intake in comparison to predicted added intake intake for the 13C single-carbon and and 15 N dual-carbon and nitrogen Bentiromide manufacturer stable isotope ratio prediction models in the testthe test group Important difference distinction 15N dual-carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratio prediction models in group (n = 56). (n = 56). Important in between reported added sugars intake and Noscapine (hydrochloride) supplier dual-isotope model at p p = 0.02. 13 and 15 N dual-isotope model (mean in between reported added sugars intake and dual-isotope model at = 0.02. 13 C C and 15N dual-isotope model (mean differencedifference common error = 13.0 g; 5.4= -2.95; two.95; 0.003). NoNo significantdifference was identified among reported regular error = 13.0 five.4 Z g; Z = – p = p = 0.003). substantial distinction was identified in between reported added added sugars intake and predicted added intake for the the 13 C single-isotope model (mean difference typical sugars intake and predicted added sugars sugars intake for 13C single-isotope model (mean distinction standard error = -3.6 five.5error = -3.6 5.5 g; Z = -0.55, p = 0.59). g; Z = -0.55, p = 0.59).Figure 1. Reported added sugars intake in comparison with predicted added sugars intake for the 13C single-carbon and 13C and 15N dual-carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratio prediction models within the test group (n = 56). Significant distinction among reported added sugars intake and dual-isotope model at p = 0.02. 13C and 15N dual-isotope model (imply differNutrientsence 3, 3842 error = 13.0 five.four g; Z = -2.95; p = 0.003). No important difference was found among reported added 2021, typical sugars intake and predicted added sugars intake for the 13C single-isotope model (imply difference regular error = -3.6 five.5 g; Z = -0.55, p = 0.59).6 ofFigure two. Bland ltman analysis of reported and predicted added sugars intake a using a C singleFigure two. Bland ltman analysis of reported and predicted added sugars intake (g) employing (g) 13C single-carbon steady isotope ratiopredictionmodel in within the test group 56). 56). center line rep- represents the carbon steady isotope ratio prediction model the test group (n = (n = The The center line resents the mean difference, as well as the upper and lower lines indicate the mean 1.96 regular deviation. imply distinction, along with the upper and reduced lines indicate the imply 1.96 regular deviation.Nutrients 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW3.3. Dual-Isotope Equation3.three. Dual-Isotope Equation7 of 11 Wh.
