To 3 weeks prior to heading) whereas the lowest number of unfilled grains per (±)-Catechin site Panicle (8.93) was discovered in T7 (Alternate wetting and drying condition). The amount of unfilled grains per panicle (40.96) was considerably higher than the lowest worth of eight.93 when plants have been grown in a continually wet atmosphere. The values of unfilled grains per panicle obtained from T4 (Flooding from transplanting to three weeks ahead of 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-TBDMS-Ac-rC Cell Cycle/DNA Damage heading and from heading to 3 weeks after heading) was statistically equivalent with T1 (Flooding all through the growth period) as reported in Table two. Different water management practices had a important impact on 1000grain weight (p = 0.000) of BRRI dhan28 (Table 2). The highest 1000grain weight (22.80 g) was identified in T7 (Alternate wetting and drying) situation. T6 (Flooding from transplanting for 2 weeks after which from 3 weeks before heading to 3 weeks just after heading) had the second highest 1000grain weight (20.27 g), which was statistically similar to T5 (Flooding from transplanting for 2 weeks and after that from 3 weeks just before heading to 3 weeks just after heading). The 1000grain weight showed the lowest value of 14.76 g in T5 (Flooding from transplanting to 3 weeks just before heading). When plants had been grown below constantly flooded condition, the value of 1000grain weight was observed as 16.26 g.Table two. Effects of water management on plant development parameters of BRRI dhan28. Plant Height (cm) 83.5 1.7 81.0 1.five 81.1 0.5 78.7 0.8 78.0 two.7 81.6 1.9 82.five two.2 0.336 Panicle Length (cm) 22.1 0.three 21.6 0.2 22.0 0.five 22.0 0.5 21.0 0.four 22.0 0.3 22.1 0.7 0.644 Filled Grains per Panicle (No.) 70.40 two.93 cd 78.45 1.33 abc 74.33 0.35 bc 73.37 .65 c 64.03 two.89 d 82.89 0.9 ab 86.22 1.13 a 0.000 Unfilled Grains per Panicle (No.) 40.96 1.65 bc 36.47 0.80 c 44.11 1.17 b 41.83 0.69 bc 59.49 2 a 19.75 0.41 d eight.93 0.32 e 0.000 1000Grain Weight (g) 16.26 0.19 de 18.20 0.17 c 17.70 0.36 cd 19.03 0.19 bc 14.76 0.29 e 20.27 0.29 b 22.80 0.55 a 0.Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 p valueFigures within a column obtaining common letters don’t differ substantially at 5 amount of significance; p = Probability; SE ( = Standard Error.3.2. Effects of Water Management around the Yield of Rice (cv. BRRI dhan28) Grain yield of BRRI dhan28 as reported in Table three was substantially influenced by distinctive water management practices (p = 0.001). The highest grain yield of 21.08 g/pot was observed when grown under alternate wetting and drying condition (T7 ). In T1 (Flooding throughout the development period), a grain yield of 13.90 g/pot was recorded. The lowest grain yield (13.52 g/pot) was observed in T5 (Flooding from transplanting to three weeks ahead of heading). The grain yield enhance more than manage ranged from 51.65 to 16.55 using the highest enhance in T7 (Alternate wetting and drying) and the lowest boost in T4 (Flooding from transplanting to 3 weeks just before heading and from heading to three weeks afterAgronomy 2021, 11,7 ofheading). A adverse worth of grain yield increase over control (2.73 ) was identified in T5 (Flooding from transplanting to three weeks before heading), which was not widespread in water management practices (Table three). Based on the grain yield, the therapies might be ranked inside the order: T7 T6 T2 T3 T4 T1 T5 . Like grain yield, the straw yield of rice (BRRI dhan28) was also considerably influenced by distinct water management practices (p = 0.015) (Table three). The highest straw yield (22.02 g/pot) was observed in T7 (Alternate wetting and drying) which was statistically similar wit.
