He presence of thermal gradient in its substrate. To do so, a thermal gradient is added to the aforementioned substrate with stiffness gradient. It is assumed that the temperature at x = 0 is equal to 36 and at x = 400 m is 39 [19], while th = 0.2. This creates a linear thermal gradient throughout the substrate along x axis. At the beginning, the cell is located at one of the corners of the substrate near the boundary surface with minimum temperature. The results indicate that the cell gradually elongates and migrates towards warmer zone in direction of the thermal gradient by means of thermotaxis (Fig 9). Fig 6 demonstrates the trajectory that is tracked by the cell centroid. In this case also there is an IEP located at x = 359 ?3 m (Fig 8) that the cell centroid finally move around it. Comparing the trajectory of the cell centroid in the presence of thermotaxis with that of pure mechanotaxis indicates that the cell centroid slightly moves towards the end of the substrate with greater temperature. Once the cell achieves IEP, it extends protrusions randomly in different directions maintaining the position of the cell centroid near the IEP. These findings are independent from the initial cell position and are consistent with experimental findings of Higazi et al. [19] who demonstrated that trophoblasts migrate towards warmer locations due to thermal gradient. Comparing RIs of mechanotaxis and thermotaxis cases in Fig 8 illustrates that adding thermotaxis cue to the substrate with stiffness gradient causes decrease in cell random motility (increase in RI). Because mechanical and thermal gradients, which are in the same directions, contribute with each other to more (-)-Blebbistatin solubility directionally guide the cell. Both the cell elongation and the CMI follow the same trend as mechanotaxis example but in average there is an increase in their amount, which means the contribution of mechanotaxis and thermotaxis increases the cell elongation and the CMI (Fig 10). The thermal gradient imposed here may be considered as the BelinostatMedChemExpress PXD101 maximum biological gradient, which is applicable in cell environment. We have repeated the simulation for mild thermal gradients but there is no considerable deviation in results (results not shown).PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 March 30,17 /3D Num. Model of Cell Morphology during Mig. in Multi-Signaling Sub.Therefore, it can be deduced that the variation of gradient slope in thermotaxis do not dramatically affect the final results because in biological ranges, sharp thermal gradients are not applicable. However, it is noticeable that the cell does not exhibit significant thermotactic response to a very mild thermal gradients (when difference between maximum and minimum temperatures is less than 0.2 in the substrate).Cell behavior in the presence of chemotaxisMany experimental investigations have demonstrated that the cell has a directional migratory capability in presence of a shallow chemoattractant gradient within 3D surrounding substrates [16, 104]. In vitro, observations indicate that cells include a strong basal pseudopod cycle by which pseudopod extension occurs along chemical gradient at the close side of the cell to the higher chemical concentration [20]. This means that the cell elongates its body in direction of chemical gradient towards the higher concentration of chemoattractant substance. Here, to consider effect of chemotaxis on cell behavior, a chemical gradient is added into the same substrate with stiffness grad.He presence of thermal gradient in its substrate. To do so, a thermal gradient is added to the aforementioned substrate with stiffness gradient. It is assumed that the temperature at x = 0 is equal to 36 and at x = 400 m is 39 [19], while th = 0.2. This creates a linear thermal gradient throughout the substrate along x axis. At the beginning, the cell is located at one of the corners of the substrate near the boundary surface with minimum temperature. The results indicate that the cell gradually elongates and migrates towards warmer zone in direction of the thermal gradient by means of thermotaxis (Fig 9). Fig 6 demonstrates the trajectory that is tracked by the cell centroid. In this case also there is an IEP located at x = 359 ?3 m (Fig 8) that the cell centroid finally move around it. Comparing the trajectory of the cell centroid in the presence of thermotaxis with that of pure mechanotaxis indicates that the cell centroid slightly moves towards the end of the substrate with greater temperature. Once the cell achieves IEP, it extends protrusions randomly in different directions maintaining the position of the cell centroid near the IEP. These findings are independent from the initial cell position and are consistent with experimental findings of Higazi et al. [19] who demonstrated that trophoblasts migrate towards warmer locations due to thermal gradient. Comparing RIs of mechanotaxis and thermotaxis cases in Fig 8 illustrates that adding thermotaxis cue to the substrate with stiffness gradient causes decrease in cell random motility (increase in RI). Because mechanical and thermal gradients, which are in the same directions, contribute with each other to more directionally guide the cell. Both the cell elongation and the CMI follow the same trend as mechanotaxis example but in average there is an increase in their amount, which means the contribution of mechanotaxis and thermotaxis increases the cell elongation and the CMI (Fig 10). The thermal gradient imposed here may be considered as the maximum biological gradient, which is applicable in cell environment. We have repeated the simulation for mild thermal gradients but there is no considerable deviation in results (results not shown).PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 March 30,17 /3D Num. Model of Cell Morphology during Mig. in Multi-Signaling Sub.Therefore, it can be deduced that the variation of gradient slope in thermotaxis do not dramatically affect the final results because in biological ranges, sharp thermal gradients are not applicable. However, it is noticeable that the cell does not exhibit significant thermotactic response to a very mild thermal gradients (when difference between maximum and minimum temperatures is less than 0.2 in the substrate).Cell behavior in the presence of chemotaxisMany experimental investigations have demonstrated that the cell has a directional migratory capability in presence of a shallow chemoattractant gradient within 3D surrounding substrates [16, 104]. In vitro, observations indicate that cells include a strong basal pseudopod cycle by which pseudopod extension occurs along chemical gradient at the close side of the cell to the higher chemical concentration [20]. This means that the cell elongates its body in direction of chemical gradient towards the higher concentration of chemoattractant substance. Here, to consider effect of chemotaxis on cell behavior, a chemical gradient is added into the same substrate with stiffness grad.
