Th C. neoformans var. grubii and var. neoformans compared to C. gattii. Clinical data support this, since infections of immunocompromised hosts with C. neoformans var grubii is far more prevalent than infection with C. gattii [20]. A potential limitation of our study is that heat-killed instead of live cryptococci were used. However, at the temperatures used for heat-killing, most virulence factors (HIV-RT inhibitor 1 web capsular polysaccharide, lipoproteins) are retained. Moreover, in number of previous studies, heat-killed cryptococci were used and significant inflammatory responses specific for capsulated and unencapsulated cryptococci were found [21,22]. One study investigated lymphocyte proliferation after stimulation with live and heat-killed cryptococci and found no difference [23]. Thus, we feel that in this study, the use of heat-killed crytococci is justified. Our experiments using a virulent C. gattii strain in stimulating PBMCs that were pre-incubated with specific PRR-blocking reagents indicate a role for TLR4 and TLR9 in recognizing Cryptococcus and subsequently modulation of the pro-inflammatory buy 3PO cytokine response. TLR4 seemed to be involved in mounting a pro-inflammatory cytokine response. Previous studies suggest that glucuronoxylomannan, the major capsular component [15] or other cryptococcal cell wall elements [24] are involved in binding to TLR4. In this study we did not design experiments in order to identify which cell wall components are involved in the initial cytokine response. Cytokine responses appeared to be independent of TLR2 recognition, since blocking of this receptor had no effect on cytokine concentrations. This contrasted with what is found in mice by Biondo et al. who demonstrated a key role of TLR2, but not of TLR4 [12]. Other studies, however, found no major role for TLR2 in survival of cryptococcal infections in a murine model [11,13]. Based on our results, a special role in Cryptococcus recognition can be ascribed to TLR9. Unmethylated CpG-rich DNA is the best-known ligand for this receptor. Nakamura et al. have shown that TLR9 recognizes cryptococcal DNA [14]. We found that this receptor mediates IL-17 production, without any effect on IL-22. Conversely, blockade of TLR9 resulted in increased IL-1bCryptococcus gattii Induced Cytokine Patternproduction in response to C. gattii. The latter effect opposes the possible effect of TLR4. However, a specific combination of PRRs that bind 18325633 available fungal PAMPs lead to pathways that interact with each other because of a limited set of shared adaptor molecules and transcription factors, and converge to a tailored response [25]. Likely, TLR9 and TLR4 work together in recognizing Cryptococcus and their signaling pathways interact downstream. Interestingly, we did not see TLR9 dependent negative modulation of C. neoformans var. grubii, indicating that the TLR9 dependent recognition of Cryptococcus is species-dependent. Negative modulation of immune responses to fungal pathogens mediated by TLR9 have been observed in other studies [26]. As the host’s response to C. gattii relies on an initial pro-inflammatory cytokine response more than in C. neoformans infections, it can be speculated that susceptibility to C. gattii is influenced by subtle TLR polymorphisms and not necessarily by a defective adaptive immune response. In the present study we investigated the in-vitro cytokine production of human PBMCs incubated with 40 different heatkilled isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans specie.Th C. neoformans var. grubii and var. neoformans compared to C. gattii. Clinical data support this, since infections of immunocompromised hosts with C. neoformans var grubii is far more prevalent than infection with C. gattii [20]. A potential limitation of our study is that heat-killed instead of live cryptococci were used. However, at the temperatures used for heat-killing, most virulence factors (capsular polysaccharide, lipoproteins) are retained. Moreover, in number of previous studies, heat-killed cryptococci were used and significant inflammatory responses specific for capsulated and unencapsulated cryptococci were found [21,22]. One study investigated lymphocyte proliferation after stimulation with live and heat-killed cryptococci and found no difference [23]. Thus, we feel that in this study, the use of heat-killed crytococci is justified. Our experiments using a virulent C. gattii strain in stimulating PBMCs that were pre-incubated with specific PRR-blocking reagents indicate a role for TLR4 and TLR9 in recognizing Cryptococcus and subsequently modulation of the pro-inflammatory cytokine response. TLR4 seemed to be involved in mounting a pro-inflammatory cytokine response. Previous studies suggest that glucuronoxylomannan, the major capsular component [15] or other cryptococcal cell wall elements [24] are involved in binding to TLR4. In this study we did not design experiments in order to identify which cell wall components are involved in the initial cytokine response. Cytokine responses appeared to be independent of TLR2 recognition, since blocking of this receptor had no effect on cytokine concentrations. This contrasted with what is found in mice by Biondo et al. who demonstrated a key role of TLR2, but not of TLR4 [12]. Other studies, however, found no major role for TLR2 in survival of cryptococcal infections in a murine model [11,13]. Based on our results, a special role in Cryptococcus recognition can be ascribed to TLR9. Unmethylated CpG-rich DNA is the best-known ligand for this receptor. Nakamura et al. have shown that TLR9 recognizes cryptococcal DNA [14]. We found that this receptor mediates IL-17 production, without any effect on IL-22. Conversely, blockade of TLR9 resulted in increased IL-1bCryptococcus gattii Induced Cytokine Patternproduction in response to C. gattii. The latter effect opposes the possible effect of TLR4. However, a specific combination of PRRs that bind 18325633 available fungal PAMPs lead to pathways that interact with each other because of a limited set of shared adaptor molecules and transcription factors, and converge to a tailored response [25]. Likely, TLR9 and TLR4 work together in recognizing Cryptococcus and their signaling pathways interact downstream. Interestingly, we did not see TLR9 dependent negative modulation of C. neoformans var. grubii, indicating that the TLR9 dependent recognition of Cryptococcus is species-dependent. Negative modulation of immune responses to fungal pathogens mediated by TLR9 have been observed in other studies [26]. As the host’s response to C. gattii relies on an initial pro-inflammatory cytokine response more than in C. neoformans infections, it can be speculated that susceptibility to C. gattii is influenced by subtle TLR polymorphisms and not necessarily by a defective adaptive immune response. In the present study we investigated the in-vitro cytokine production of human PBMCs incubated with 40 different heatkilled isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans specie.