The same samples by using the Fluidigm 1516647 BioMark System.sion range of the data, as measured by log10 signal intensity, was the greatest for miRNAseq (5.4 log), followed by Agilent (4.8 log), Affymetrix (4.0 log), NanoString (3.7 log), and Illumina (2.7 log).Cross-platform ComparisonsAmong the miRNA targets, we identified 484 transcripts that were commonly interrogated among all tested platforms and we used this set for cross-platform comparisons (Figure S1). For FF and its matched FFPE sample, the number of detected miRNA transcripts was similar for the Affymetrix, Agilent, and NanoString platforms, but varied considerably for Illumina and miRNA-Seq. For sample FF1, detection of commonly interrogated miRNA ranged from 35.33 for Affymetrix to 69.42 for miRNA-Seq (Table S1). As expected, sample FF2 gave similar results. However, detection by Affymetrix and NanoString was 
nearly 10 higher in FF2 than FF1. FFPE samples gave nearly identical detection rates, ranging from 32 by Agilent to greater than 70 for miRNA-Seq. Cell line H1299 samples also demonstrated a similar level of detection within each platform. However, the number of detected miRNA transcripts in H1299 were, overall, lower than for the fresh frozen or FFPE samples. Indeed, both Agilent and NanoString platforms exhibited detection calls only 12 to 14 of the commonly interrogated transcripts in H1299 cells. In contrast, Illumina-detected miRNA were nearly five-fold higher than the other platforms in H1299 cells. To assess the agreement of miRNA transcript detection get Z-360 across platforms, as well as the criteria used by each platform to determine detected/present calls, we used the 484 commonly interrogated transcripts to make platform-to-platform comparisons for each sample (Figure S2). The number of detected transcripts for Affymetrix, Agilent, and NanoString platforms was similar within a sample. Across samples, the number of detected transcripts was also relatively consistent for these platforms, with the exception that fewer miRNA 
were detected in the cell lines H1299-1 and H1299-2 (Table S2). The Illumina and miRNA-Seq comparison showed that these platforms detected transcripts similarly across the sample types. Some of the miRNA transcripts were almost universally expressed in all tested samples and detected at relatively consistent levels across all platforms (Table S4 A ). Examples of these miRNAs are miR-26a, let7a, and miR-24. Transcripts let-7b and miR-23a were present in the top 50 15755315 ranked genes in FF and FFPE samples across all platforms. But they did not appear in this ranking among the H1299 cell line replicates.HIF-2��-IN-1 Results Performance of miRNA Expression Profiling Analysis within Each PlatformTotal RNA extracted from lung samples FF1, FF2, FFPE9a, FFPE9b, and cell line H1299 was used as input material for intraand inter- platform comparisons of miRNA expression assays (Figure 1). MiRNA detection counts varied according to the sample type and miRNA expression platform (Table 1). For the Affymetrix microarray platform, the number of detected transcripts ranged from 340 for FF2 to 221 for H1299-2. Intraplatform Pearson correlations (r) of the replicates ranged from 0.951 to 0.974. Agilent results for FF and FFPE were relatively consistent across the two tissue sample types. However, H1299-1 and H1299-2 lung cancer cell lines demonstrated lower detection counts, with 74 and 87 miRNA transcripts, respectively. The number of detected genes for the Illumina microarray platfo.The same samples by using the Fluidigm 1516647 BioMark System.sion range of the data, as measured by log10 signal intensity, was the greatest for miRNAseq (5.4 log), followed by Agilent (4.8 log), Affymetrix (4.0 log), NanoString (3.7 log), and Illumina (2.7 log).Cross-platform ComparisonsAmong the miRNA targets, we identified 484 transcripts that were commonly interrogated among all tested platforms and we used this set for cross-platform comparisons (Figure S1). For FF and its matched FFPE sample, the number of detected miRNA transcripts was similar for the Affymetrix, Agilent, and NanoString platforms, but varied considerably for Illumina and miRNA-Seq. For sample FF1, detection of commonly interrogated miRNA ranged from 35.33 for Affymetrix to 69.42 for miRNA-Seq (Table S1). As expected, sample FF2 gave similar results. However, detection by Affymetrix and NanoString was nearly 10 higher in FF2 than FF1. FFPE samples gave nearly identical detection rates, ranging from 32 by Agilent to greater than 70 for miRNA-Seq. Cell line H1299 samples also demonstrated a similar level of detection within each platform. However, the number of detected miRNA transcripts in H1299 were, overall, lower than for the fresh frozen or FFPE samples. Indeed, both Agilent and NanoString platforms exhibited detection calls only 12 to 14 of the commonly interrogated transcripts in H1299 cells. In contrast, Illumina-detected miRNA were nearly five-fold higher than the other platforms in H1299 cells. To assess the agreement of miRNA transcript detection across platforms, as well as the criteria used by each platform to determine detected/present calls, we used the 484 commonly interrogated transcripts to make platform-to-platform comparisons for each sample (Figure S2). The number of detected transcripts for Affymetrix, Agilent, and NanoString platforms was similar within a sample. Across samples, the number of detected transcripts was also relatively consistent for these platforms, with the exception that fewer miRNA were detected in the cell lines H1299-1 and H1299-2 (Table S2). The Illumina and miRNA-Seq comparison showed that these platforms detected transcripts similarly across the sample types. Some of the miRNA transcripts were almost universally expressed in all tested samples and detected at relatively consistent levels across all platforms (Table S4 A ). Examples of these miRNAs are miR-26a, let7a, and miR-24. Transcripts let-7b and miR-23a were present in the top 50 15755315 ranked genes in FF and FFPE samples across all platforms. But they did not appear in this ranking among the H1299 cell line replicates.Results Performance of miRNA Expression Profiling Analysis within Each PlatformTotal RNA extracted from lung samples FF1, FF2, FFPE9a, FFPE9b, and cell line H1299 was used as input material for intraand inter- platform comparisons of miRNA expression assays (Figure 1). MiRNA detection counts varied according to the sample type and miRNA expression platform (Table 1). For the Affymetrix microarray platform, the number of detected transcripts ranged from 340 for FF2 to 221 for H1299-2. Intraplatform Pearson correlations (r) of the replicates ranged from 0.951 to 0.974. Agilent results for FF and FFPE were relatively consistent across the two tissue sample types. However, H1299-1 and H1299-2 lung cancer cell lines demonstrated lower detection counts, with 74 and 87 miRNA transcripts, respectively. The number of detected genes for the Illumina microarray platfo.
