Set about zero (i.e., Cexp – -FEM 0), as shown in Figure 8. From measurements carriedcarried the PZTthe PZT Cexp C CFEM 0), as shown in Figure eight. From measurements out on out on sample at the frequency f = three.67 fGHz, we findwedielectric continual value r,PZT = 16. In case sample in the frequency = 3.67 GHz, a find a dielectric continuous value 445 = 445 16. r,PZT on the PMN-PTPMN-PTtwo sets of measurements have been performed, performed,GHz sample, sample, two sets of measurements happen to be a single at 3.67 a single In case of the giving a value r,PMN-PTvalue r,PMN-PT the other59 as well as the other at three.60 a value r,PMN-PTto at three.67 GHz providing a = 650 59 and = 650 at three.60 GHz, leading to GHz, top = 630 67.The weighted imply valueweightedtwo values is equal to r,PMN-PT = 641 qual to a worth r,PMN-PT = 630 67. The of those mean value of these two values is 44. These 641 44. r,PMN-PT =values were obtained by using a application [39] to plot the calculated capacitance as a function of the experimental one with all the corresponding the calculated capacitance These values were obtained by using a software program [39] to plot uncertainties detailed in Section 3.3. Then, byexperimentalgeneralized least squares–generalized Gauss Markov as a function of the applying a a single with the corresponding uncertainties detailed in regression (GLS-GGMR), the slope was extracted, along with the dielectric continuous value was Section 3.3. Then, by applying a generalized least squares–generalized Gauss Markov adjusted to (GLS-GGMR), slope. Thewas extracted, and slope gives the uncertainty onwas regression obtain a unity the slope uncertainty on the the dielectric continuous value the dielectric to obtainvalue. The threeThe uncertainty on the slopeGLS-GCMR method were adjusted continuous a unity slope. r values calculated in the offers the uncertainty on successfully validated worth. The three r valuestests involving the GLS-GCMR process the dielectric constant by performing statistical calculated from and Birge ratio values [403]. The greater uncertainty performing statistical tests involving 2 and Birge ratio were successfully validated by on the PMN-PT dielectric continuous worth is on account of the bigger dimensional measurement’s errors. the PMN-PT dielectric continual worth is as a consequence of values [403]. The higher uncertainty on the bigger dimensional measurement’s with the parasitic capacitance as a function of your Figure 8b,e shows the variation errors. Figure 8b,e the gold pads for the PZT parasitic capacitance respectively. in the increasing region ofshows the variation of theand PMN-PT samples, as a functionIn each escalating region of capacitance varies the PZT and PMN-PT samples, respectively. In cases, the parasitic the gold pads for in the array of 0 fF to 80 fF inside a somewhat linear each circumstances, the parasitic capacitance fit introduced as a guide towards the in a somewhat linear fashion as indicated using the linear varies inside the Fmoc-Gly-Gly-OH Purity selection of 0 fF for80 fFeye. For the PMN-PT fashion powerful uncertainties linear tiny gold pads guide dimensional measurements sample, as indicated with all the on thefit introduced as adue to for the eye. For the PMN-PT sample, to non-consistent values for parasitic capacitances that have been excluded from give rise sturdy uncertainties on the small gold pads resulting from dimensional measurements give rise match. Nevertheless, the initial DMPO Cancer derivative on the parasitic capacitance excluded from the linearto non-consistent values for parasitic capacitances which have been with respect for the gold pad.
