Igh). The course evaluation also incorporated six openended questions (eg, workshop strengths
Igh). The course evaluation also integrated 6 openended questions (eg, workshop strengths, ideas, amount of comfort in instruction others). For each workshop, we calculated average scores for quantitative items and recorded all comments for openended questions. All participants who attended a workshop through the specified period have been invited to take part in the PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479161 followup survey, performed in 2008. We created a structured phone interview guide (Appendix) consisting of 43 things that explored use of the NEMS measures, reactions to the NEMS workshop, and education other people around the measures. For the purposes of this evaluation, we defined adoption on the NEMS measures as any use, including customization, enumeration (identifying and classifying food outlets), or other arranging; data collection, management, or analysis; disseminating or education others on the measures; or use of NEMS measures as a reference for developing another GW274150 site Assessment tool. We made use of archival data (eg, prior communication) when available to supplement survey responses; for 7 NEMS participants who didn’t respond for the survey, we used archival facts toResultsReachWe have conducted 24 dissemination workshops (six in 2006, 7 in 2007, 9 in 2008, and two in 2009), reaching a lot more than 300 participants from 40 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, people today in 8 foreign countries have attended NEMS workshops or applied the measures. Ten workshops were held in Atlanta, Georgia, exactly where the NEMS group was primarily based. In the invitation of regional organizers, 4 workshops had been held at other places. In 2008 and 2009, NEMS workshops have been included as a part of the Built Atmosphere Assessment Training Institute, a weeklong plan that trains participants to work with highquality measures of nutrition and physical activity environments (med.upenn.eduBEAT).Participant characteristicsA total of 73 persons attended the four workshops included within the followup evaluation. Participants’ most common skilled settings had been academic (02 participants) and state or local public health agencies (44 participants).The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions with the US Division of Overall health and Human Services, the Public Well being Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and will not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.cdc.govpcdissues200nov09_0220.htm Centers for Illness Manage and PreventionVOLUME 7: NO. 6 NOVEMBERSeventyfour participants attended workshops in Atlanta; 99 attended at other locations. Postcourse evaluations had been completed by 54 (94 ) from the 64 participants who received these evaluations. A total of 29 respondents (75 ) participated in the followup survey. There had been no important differences among respondents and nonrespondents in terms of the workshop form, location (Atlanta or offsite), year of education, or experienced setting (Table ).Workshop feedbackIn postcourse evaluations, participants from all workshops rated the general workshop an average of 4.8 out of 5, and typical ratings for all items had been 4.five or greater. Survey respondents cited fieldwork and practice with the measures, interactive workouts and , structure and organization, and high-quality with the NEMS group as workshop strengths. Recommendations for improvement included adding far more time for ; information and facts on information management, cleaning, and evaluation; m.
