Rstanding of our participants’ practical experience.Solutions Participants and SettingParticipants received complete
Rstanding of our participants’ experience.Approaches Participants and SettingParticipants received total written details regarding the scope on the analysis, the identity and affiliation of the researchers, the possibility of withdrawing from the study at any point, confidentiality, and all other details necessary in accordance with Italian policies for psychological analysis and with the Helsinki Declaration, as revised in 989. Participants (and their parents, for minors) offered written consent. This study received approval in the institutional evaluation boards in the 3 hospitals involved: Santa Giuliana Hospital, Verona; Este Hospital, Padua; Monselice Hospital, Padua. These have been two neighborhood common hospitals (with inpatient and outpatient adolescent psychiatric departments) and one psychiatric hospital in northeastern Italy. Physicians or psychologists at these hospitals were contacted and asked if they had patients who might be appropriate subjects for any study of adolescent suicide attempts. Subjects were eligible only if they had attempted suicide for the duration of adolescence or in the postadolescent period and have been aged 5 to 25 years old at the time from the interview. Eligible subjects were then contacted. Purposive sampling [9] was undertaken, and inclusion of subjects continued till saturation was reached [20]. As recommended for Interpretive Phenomenological Evaluation (IPA) [2,22], we chose to focus on 
only several cases and to analyze their accounts in depth. In addition, to contain a heterogeneous sample with maximum variation [9], we included both adolescents with only a single suicidal act and these with numerous acts. We were therefore capable to consider a wide array of conditions and experiences. Sixteen Italian adolescents (sex ratio 🙂 freely agreed to participate in the study (two refused, one particular male and 1 female). Their median age was 20 years in the interview, and 6 in the suicide attempt. Half had a history of prior attempts ( , see Table ).Data CollectionData had been collected via six individual semistructured facetoface interviews. The interviews have been audiorecorded and subsequently transcribed verbatim, with all nuances of your participants’ expression recorded. An L 663536 web interview subject guide (Table 2) was developed in advance and incorporated eight openended questions and a number of prompts. The logic underpinning the construction with the interview guide was to elicit indepth and detailed accounts of your subjects’ feelings prior to the suicide try and afterwards, as well because the expectations and meanings that they connected to this action. Our all round objective in making use of this qualitative strategy was to place ourselves within the lived globe of every participant and explore the meaning of your experience to each of them. Fourteen interviews took location in the adolescents’ therapy facility, 1 in the adolescent’s house, and one in the residential facility where the adolescent was living. Given that thePLOS One particular plosone.orgQualitative Method to Attempted Suicide by YouthTable . Participants’ traits.Name M M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 F F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 FGender (malefemale) male male male male male male male male female female female female female female female femaleAge in the interview (y) eight 2 9 20 20 20 eight 9 7 25 8 20 8 20 24Age at (1st) suicidal act (y) 6 7 7 6 eight 6 six 6 6 five 7 9 6 9 5Repeated PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21425987 suicidal act (yesno) no no no no no yes no yes no no no yes yes no yes yesdoi:0.37journal.pone.009676.tWe report the study in accordance with the COREQ statement. (.
