S function and instruction. In neither study is data pertinent to
S function and coaching. In neither study is information pertinent to group leaderstherapists presented. Considerably, and within the light with the goal from the present study that is to present descriptive data pertaining to group leaders’ perceptions of their work with grandparent caregivers, in none on the above operate with such persons are group leadertherapist perceptions discussed. Eventually, such perceptions could bear on the impactefficacy of a offered intervention targeting grandparents raising grandchildren, being it schoolbased, psychotherapeutic, support grouprelated, or communitybased.Theoretical Approaches to Smaller Group LeadershipA selection of diverse theoretical approaches exist for understanding the possible good or damaging effect of group leaders on the participants within the groups they have led (see testimonials by Dihn et al 204; Haslam, Reicher, Platow, 205). Various of these FGFR4-IN-1 web theories are relevant towards the queries we were keen on asking plus the data we collected. 1 class of theories focuses upon leader qualities. One example is, perception of selfefficacy (see Bandura, 977) could possibly be important to leaders’ effectiveness (Kane et al 2002). Alternatively, incivility spiral theory (Pearson, Andersson Porath, 2005) suggests that a leader’s incivility influences the appearance of similar behaviors among group members, undermining group cohesion and communication. Likewise, one’s Leadership Style (termed authoritarianhierarchicalinstrumental versus responsibleparticipative) (see Storsletten Jakobsen, 205) reflects the nature of one’s views about group participants (as either far more or significantly less highly effective, in will need of versus not requiring handle, or in some manner inferior to the leader versus seeing such persons as equals) and has been employed extensively to know group leadership. To the extent that 1 style is superior towards the other is dependent upon the predicament in which leadership is exercised (Vecchio, Bullis, Brazil, 2006).Grandfamilies. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 206 September 29.Hayslip et al.PageAlternatively, other theories emphasize interactions amongst group leaders and group participants, wherein leaders in varying degrees reinforce group members, use verbal and nonverbal communication techniques, or interact with group members dependent upon the latter’s individual attributes (Dies, 977). 1 could possibly also make use of Functional Leadership Theory (Kane, 996; Kane et al 2002) to know group leaders’ perceptions of their roles (e.g. boundaries, responsibilities) and the adequacy of their capability to meet such roles. Functional Leadership Theory could also be made use of to know leaders’ views relating to the roles they count on group participants to play, such as their perceptions of what group participants anticipate of them as leaders. Group Focal Conflict Theory (see Champe Rubel, 202) stresses the leader’s capability to reduce a selection PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23701633 of prospective focal intragroup conflicts via the creation of an enabling group atmosphere stressing the development of productive options to resolve group members’ conflict.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptGroup Leaders’ Influence and Impact on Group MembersIn light on the diversity of theoretical approaches to studying group leadership, it can be not surprising that they’ve generated a great deal of analysis speaking to the prospective influence leaders can have on group members. In this light, it’s indeed the case that leader effects have been observed.
