Hat enzymes enter post-polymerization via the open plus end of the microtubule and diffuse within the microtubule [23], a scenario unlikely based on luminal diffusion rates [35] and the fact that cytoplasmic microtubules are primarily acetylated at internal sites rather than at the open plus ends most accessible to cytoplasmic enzymes [33,36]. A third possibility is that enzymes access the microtubule lumen post-polymerization via lateral defects that allow “breathing” within the microtubule lattice and/ or exchange of tubulin subunits [12,24,37?9].Figure 3. K40 acetylation does not directly influence the binding of Kinesin-1 to microtubules. Myc-tagged versions of full-length kinesin-1 heavy chain (myc-KHC) or truncated, constitutively active constructs (1?91 and 1?79) were expressed in COS7 cells. Increasing amounts of cell lysates were used in microtubule binding assays with a constant amount of taxol-stabilized acetylated (blue lines) or deacetylated (red lines) microtubules and AMPPNP. The percentage of kinesin-1 motor copelleting with microtubules was quantified. Graphs indicate the average of four independent experiments. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048204.gCryo-EM Localization of Acetyl-K40 on MicrotubulesFigure 4. Monoclonal (6-11B-1) and polyclonal (anti-acetyl-K40) antibodies differ in their ability to recognize deacetylated microtubules in vitro. Taxol-stabilized microtubules polymerized from acetylated or deacetylated tubulins were stained immediately (Live) or after fixation with paraformaldehyde (PFA fixed) with A) monoclonal 6-11B-1 antibody (CPI-455 web magenta) or B) polyclonal anti-acetyl-K40 antibody (magenta). The total tubulin in each sample was detected with DM1A antibody (green). Scale bars, 20 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048204.gOur finding that the K40 acetylation site is located in the microtubule lumen also has important implications for how atubulin acetylation can influence events on the microtubule surface. It seems unlikely that the presence or absence of an acetyl group on the luminal K40 residue directly influences motors and MAPs on the microtubule surface. Indeed, we find that for kinesin-1, altering K40 acetylation alone has no effect on the ability of the motor to bind strongly to microtubule. In a similar study, Danoprevir biological activity Walter et al. recently showed that K40 acetylation does not directly affect kinesin-1 velocity and run length along the microtubule surface [40]. It thus appears that the influence of K40 acetylation on motor-dependent transport events [15?8] is due to additional factors and/or modifications within K40-marked cellular microtubules that are not replicated by alteration of only the K40 acetylation state in vitro. For example, K40 acetylation may cause a conformational change in tubulin structure within cellular microtubules or it could serve as a priming event for further tubulin modifications such as additional acetylation events or other PTMs. Further identification of tubulin PTMs and characterization of their effects alone and in concert will be required to test these possibilities. Both the monoclonal and polyclonal acetyl-K40 antibodies labeled cytoplasmic microtubules in a non-uniform manner (Figure S4A) [33,36]. The fact that two different antibodies generate similar staining patterns suggests that the non-uniform acetyl-K40 levels along the microtubule filament are not anartifact of antigen recognition by the monoclonal antibody. Rather, it appears that sections of microtubules must differ in.Hat enzymes enter post-polymerization via the open plus end of the microtubule and diffuse within the microtubule [23], a scenario unlikely based on luminal diffusion rates [35] and the fact that cytoplasmic microtubules are primarily acetylated at internal sites rather than at the open plus ends most accessible to cytoplasmic enzymes [33,36]. A third possibility is that enzymes access the microtubule lumen post-polymerization via lateral defects that allow “breathing” within the microtubule lattice and/ or exchange of tubulin subunits [12,24,37?9].Figure 3. K40 acetylation does not directly influence the binding of Kinesin-1 to microtubules. Myc-tagged versions of full-length kinesin-1 heavy chain (myc-KHC) or truncated, constitutively active constructs (1?91 and 1?79) were expressed in COS7 cells. Increasing amounts of cell lysates were used in microtubule binding assays with a constant amount of taxol-stabilized acetylated (blue lines) or deacetylated (red lines) microtubules and AMPPNP. The percentage of kinesin-1 motor copelleting with microtubules was quantified. Graphs indicate the average of four independent experiments. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048204.gCryo-EM Localization of Acetyl-K40 on MicrotubulesFigure 4. Monoclonal (6-11B-1) and polyclonal (anti-acetyl-K40) antibodies differ in their ability to recognize deacetylated microtubules in vitro. Taxol-stabilized microtubules polymerized from acetylated or deacetylated tubulins were stained immediately (Live) or after fixation with paraformaldehyde (PFA fixed) with A) monoclonal 6-11B-1 antibody (magenta) or B) polyclonal anti-acetyl-K40 antibody (magenta). The total tubulin in each sample was detected with DM1A antibody (green). Scale bars, 20 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048204.gOur finding that the K40 acetylation site is located in the microtubule lumen also has important implications for how atubulin acetylation can influence events on the microtubule surface. It seems unlikely that the presence or absence of an acetyl group on the luminal K40 residue directly influences motors and MAPs on the microtubule surface. Indeed, we find that for kinesin-1, altering K40 acetylation alone has no effect on the ability of the motor to bind strongly to microtubule. In a similar study, Walter et al. recently showed that K40 acetylation does not directly affect kinesin-1 velocity and run length along the microtubule surface [40]. It thus appears that the influence of K40 acetylation on motor-dependent transport events [15?8] is due to additional factors and/or modifications within K40-marked cellular microtubules that are not replicated by alteration of only the K40 acetylation state in vitro. For example, K40 acetylation may cause a conformational change in tubulin structure within cellular microtubules or it could serve as a priming event for further tubulin modifications such as additional acetylation events or other PTMs. Further identification of tubulin PTMs and characterization of their effects alone and in concert will be required to test these possibilities. Both the monoclonal and polyclonal acetyl-K40 antibodies labeled cytoplasmic microtubules in a non-uniform manner (Figure S4A) [33,36]. The fact that two different antibodies generate similar staining patterns suggests that the non-uniform acetyl-K40 levels along the microtubule filament are not anartifact of antigen recognition by the monoclonal antibody. Rather, it appears that sections of microtubules must differ in.
